Fuji instead of Sony?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
SafariBob
SafariBob Contributing Member • Posts: 629
Re: Fuji instead of Sony?
4

TQGroup wrote:

GrapeJam wrote:

Joe Tam wrote:

Canon's new lens mount and their unique lenses have the potential to really kick a## when a pro body comes out.

If the 50mm f1.2 R and the 28 - 70mm f2.0 are any indication, the R mount's lenses are gonna be stupidly huge and expensive they will only be afforded by an extreme minority.

Good w*nking material for Canon fanboys thought, even thought the extreme vast majority of them will never be able to afford them

And you're seriously underestimating the E mount here, Sony has a patent for a 28 70 f2.0 and the (now defunct) Meyer optik and Zhongyi have demonstrated that the E Mount are also capable of exotic ultra wide aperture lenses too.

And as much as Canon fanboys want you to believe, the average people (including professional photographers) do not buy into a system because of lenses, they buy into the system usually because they look at the body specs first and then affordability.

Some buy in because of support and the overall business case.

That may explain why Canon has half the total market and more than half of the professional market without the benefit of the best performing bodies.

Serious pros buy the best glass and that lasts a long time. Bodies are changed regularly, even annually, like we change our smartphones...

Well, a while ago most pros used Nikon but people switched to canon because bodies were better, despite superior Nikon glass. Things changed when Nikon switched to Sony sensors but by then it was mostly too late.

 SafariBob's gear list:SafariBob's gear list
Sony a7R II Sony 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow