Fuji instead of Sony?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Magnar W
Magnar W Senior Member • Posts: 3,981
Re: Fuji instead of Sony?
3

TQGroup wrote:

Skilled photographers don't need heavy drastic post processing! That will absolutely spoil any colour quality

Fuji has been involved with photographic colour for around 80 years. It is highly regarded by experienced professionals. Sony is by no means bad, but just doesn't have the clarity, conviction or decisiveness of Fuji. Experience is important

Not everybody agree with you. Fuji looks great, but Sony looks even better:

https://www.pdnonline.com/gear/cameras/the-best-cameras-for-color-reproduction-ranked/?fbclid=IwAR2YhCEmE6o-F1CIPIeMWGju8f8SrmaZJ5812rucR8TB_jWx49c0JOMLzPw

 Magnar W's gear list:Magnar W's gear list
Sony a7 Sony a7R III Sony FE 90mm F2.8 macro Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Zeiss Loxia 35 +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow