Do we still "need" fast lenses ?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
jfriend00 Forum Pro • Posts: 12,364
Re: Do we still "need" fast lenses ?

HeavyDuty wrote:

I think much of the current fascination with shallow DOF is an unintended consequence of the film era. Back in the day our ability to shoot at high ISO was very limited, and this led to the development of fast glass - especially for professional use. We all became accustomed to seeing razor-thin DOF, and it became a preference for many. (I’m guilty of this myself.)

With the Z, I personally think a combination of “normal” speed lenses (f/4 zooms and f/1.8 primes) plus one or two faster lenses for special situations will serve me (and my back) the best. I’m waiting to see what the roadmapped 50/1.2S looks like, it would probably be all I need for available darkness shooting.

I predict a gradual return to deep DOF once again being in widespread fashion now that bodies are capable of extreme sensitivity with amazing results. Ansel Adams and his Group f/64 compatriots are likely watching with glee.

I think subject isolation from the background is more than a fad.  It's a photographic style that adds emphasis and perceived sharpness to the subject (particularly  when it's a person) when out in front of a nicely blurred background.  It's certainly not the only way to shoot a subject, but it's not a fad style that is going to just disappear either.

Ansel is most known for his landscapes where you certainly want as much  DOF as you can get.  I doubt it's landscape shooters who are wishing they had a faster lens.

-- hide signature --


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow