Fujifilm X-T100 Photographic Dynamic Range (PDR) at PhotonsToPhotos

bclaff wrote:

A little behind some other recent models but pretty good performance:

Note that this is not a dual conversion gain sensor.

I'm always looking to add more measurements here's what I have/don't have.

A red box indicates that I have no measurements.

I'm also missing Fixed Pattern Noise (FPN) for the following: X-E2, X-Pro1, X-T1

If you can help collect the necessary RAF files get in touch by email or Private Message.

Bill, thank you for doing this, very impressive results for the x-t100, what I notice when using dpr's exposure lattitude and iso invariance tests is just how good the x-t100 stacks up compared with the competition in real life though. For example you could surmise from your charts that the em1 ii has a better sensor, reality is much more different though! Using dpr if we first look at lattitude we can see that x-t100 is very impressive compared to m43, I tested my own camera against the G9 and it was comparable in dr (as per your test) but in lattitude the em1 ii and g9 are clear evidence of pushing shadows compared to the larger sensor. What is so impressive here is how it stacks up against the x-t2 and of course the new FF 46mp z7.

As a second example going to 1/320, well it looks even more impressive. In the real world again the shadow pull with the x-t100 is every bit as good as demonstrated here.

Moving on to iso invariance its not difficult to see the full 1 stop, probably more improvement over m43 and again, probably on par with the z7 and better than the x-t2

Its difficult to understand Fuji's concept behind the x-t100, I am not complaining its a super star, but it measures well, but in practice it appears difficult to see anything meaningfully better.