robyfor
•
Regular Member
•
Posts: 368
Re: I'm Very Impressed With Mine
Reading the various posts I am increasingly convinced that the X-T100 is a good compromise in terms of quality and price. Returning to my post I ask, from a technological point of view, what are the actual technical differences between my old Samsung NX300 and my probable new X-T100. All understood in terms of image quality improvement. Starting the NX300 to give some problems and considering that Samsung does not produce any more soon I have to find a valid alternative.
robyfor wrote:
Reading the various comments the X-T100 seems interesting also for a relationship of quality and price. With current prices you buy X-T100 + 15-45mm + 23mm F2 at the same price as X-T20 with only 15-45mm. I do not think the extra features that X-T20 has compared to the X-T100 can create such a large price gap. Without going into the merits with the many lenses that Fujifilm owns, is it possible to see how X-T100 behaves in low light conditions with the 15-45mm and 23mm f2 lenses? Alternatively, which lens are recommended for urban street photographs in low light conditions? I'm looking for a valid alternative to my old Samsung NX, which now seems destined to end its life cycle. I attach some reference photos made with my Samsung NX that I would like to shoot soon and maybe improve with a new mirrorless that could be a Fuji X. Images resized to 1600x1200. Thanks
NX300 30mm f2 iso2000 1.25
View: original size
nx300 30mm f2 iso 2500 1.60
View: original size
NX300 42mm f5.6 iso 160 1.125
View: original size
NX3000 16mm f2.4 iso500 1.30
View: original size

MakeSAMSUNGModelNX300Focal length30mmShutter speed1/60 secAperturef/2ISO2000Capture dateFri, 02 Jun 2017 21:14:04 GMT
View: original size
-- hide signature --
hide signature --
--
Samsung NX1000 - NX3000 - NX300. Lens: NX 20-50mm - 30mm f2 -
16mm F/2.4 - 45MM F/1.8 2D/3D - 18-55mm - 16-50mm - 50-200mm.
Sony HX90-Sony P200 - Fuji F30.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137263652@N05/
Stop time with photography!
Roberto