Fujifilm X-T100 - Experience and Pics

Sal Baker wrote:

Peter Jonas wrote:

Advent1sam wrote:

Peter Jonas wrote:

Advent1sam wrote:

Fezhat wrote:

It's clumsy the tilt screen is a pest to open, touch screen a bit iffy, Bluetooth so so and...... no "happy stick"

the image results are great and easy PP with the room of light

Fezhat, not sure what your agenda is here, but this is just fake news, something not right here. The tilt screen tilts up perfectly, 99% of the time, that's how I want it, its all many many cameras offer too. I am sorry but the tilt mechanism is far from clumsy, I'd say its beautifully engineered, maybe you have a different camera, not sure!

I am not sure who's got what agenda here.

But I suspect you'd think that screen is one of the clumsiest ones if the X-T100 had an X-Trans sensor.

Peter, do you have an x-t100?

No, I do not have an X-T100. What's more, I have never seen one either, nor do I have any idea what its flip up screen works like.

Please note I am not making any claims in relation to that screen.

I just know what you think about it now, and, as I stated in my previous post, I think I have a pretty good idea what you'd think about it, if that camera had an X-Trans sensor.

I don't find X-Trans to be much of an issue, at least in the 16mp generation. I slightly prefer the look of my 16mp Bayer camera except at higher ISOs, but it has a 5-year old sensor. I can make RAW files from Fuji 24mp X-Trans and Bayer look idistinguishable in Iridient Developer, but returning to LR (with the Bayer X-T100) is an attraction to me. Either of the CFAs should work fine for large prints.

Sal

Not going to dispute any of the above Sal, its correct, you can get results from both sensors, but now the x-t100 is available, wow what an opportunity for the best of both worlds, great aps-c body/glass and great raw files with acr/lr.