What fills the gap?

nnowak wrote:

MyM3 wrote:

nnowak wrote:

MyM3 wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

The gap is no gap. There are the 77D, 80D, and 7DmkII. And in the next future we will see updated versions with the EF-s mount. I think in this price range the majority of customers are o.k. with dslr's . If they want mirrorless they buy a M50 and be perfectly happy with that, or a future M model with both the strengths of the M5 and M50.

I agree with this (for the most).

And the poll misses a lot of possibilities and/or an option for "other".

If you believe I missed a significant alternative possibility, I specifically asked that you "suggest it below"

And I did. But there is no way to vote for those alternatives. Not even a "other" option. Or are you going to include peoples suggestions in a new poll?

People who disagree with the "gap" and people who see other possibilities can not vote in this poll. So it is skewed or "manipulated" and constructed to go in the favor of OP's opinion.

If you truly believe that my poll is so tragically flawed or "manipulated", please feel free to start your own.

Why would I ? I don't think there is a gap.

That is not what you have been arguing in all of your comments. You are suggesting that Canon will create an M system camera with a movable sensor to accommodate 7D users who want to utilize full frame RF glass.

Other options could be:

- Continue with the biggest cameras as DSRL's

Likely, but only for one or two more iterations.

As long as they sell and make money for Canon.

Which will only be for one or two more iterations. Mirrorless cameras have already eclipsed DSLRs in many performance metrics and there is no way for DSLRs to keep up. In 5 years, DSLRs will only be suitable for low end uses.

I also think, that mirrorless cameras are the future and dslrs will become history some day. I'm surprised Canon has refreshed many EF whites recently - is it really worth it? Would it have been better to make those as RF lenses...? 🤔