DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Is the 23mm F2 a bad lens?

Started Sep 26, 2018 | Discussions thread
deednets Forum Pro • Posts: 13,887
Re: What about these then??

akjos wrote:

deednets wrote:

Bob Tullis wrote:

akjos wrote:

Bob Tullis wrote:

If you shoot subjects at about 12" or closer, you get the softness that the lens was designed to provide.

Really?!? The lens was " designed " to provide softness. Lmao ...

Its not a bad lens but definitely underwhelming for what most people might use it for. It is pretty bad below about 4 feet from the subject like kids dogs etc which is a shame because that's how most 35s are probably used.

[chuckle]

All taken with the 23/2 - and below 4 feet (is that 1.20m??)

You were joking of course! Right??

Deed

No not really. Every lens shooting up close like this i had performed better then 23 f2. Stopping down to F4 helped some but then i might as well used the kit zoom with IS ( 18-55) which was sharper still .

Longer distances like 10+ feet the 23 was stunningly sharp even at F2.

For what OP wants to use the lens Id almost suggest 27mm pancake. That lens is amazingly sharp at any distance and provides very nice FOV for " environmental portraits "

Was that a response to my post?? If so you felt like the examples I posted were "soft"??

Deed

 deednets's gear list:deednets's gear list
Leica Q2 Fujifilm X-Pro3 Sony a7 IV Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ioh
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow