J A C S
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 20,521
Re: Sorry JACS, that's not correct either
RubberDials wrote:
J A C S wrote:
RubberDials wrote:
In lens can only give you two axes of stabilisation - pitch and yaw. To get 5 axes you need IBIS which gives you compensation on the X an Y axis plus roll.
IBIS adds roll only. The other two axes are "virtual".
No. The X and Y and roll movement is actual.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ncye37e6xM
As I said.
There's no real defence for Canon's position as the trend is to combine in-lens with in-body - all Sony lenses above 85mm have in-lens stabilisation that works in concert with the in-body stabilisation.
Something I have not seen mentioned here: The R uses the sensor feedback to control the IS of the lens. Not sure if Sony does it.
As far as I know the R body doesn't have a gyro or an accelerometer, so what motion feedback would there be from the camera?
Blur in real time. Read the white paper.
I would imagine there was a technical issue why they left it off - perhaps to do with processing power as it does involve computation.
I’m curious as to how Canon is going to charge more for features found in Sony’s $2k entry level camera with a straight face. And will people actually buy it?
Because they are better built cameras maybe that does not matter to you but I have had to chip ice off my 1D to use it how much is that quality worth.
Interesting times.
Yes interesting especially when Canon takes full advantage of the mount to design lenses that Sony can’t match due to the restrictions of their mount size.
This is marketing BS, sorry.
Why would Sigma say it? Come to the PST forum and tell us that it is BS.
Say what? No-one has provided a link to what they said.
Where is your link that this is BS?
Don has claimed that Canon has taken "full advantage of the mount to design lenses that Sony can’t match due to the restrictions of their mount size."
And that's simply rubbish. There's no other word for it.
Thank you for your deep insight. Again, read the white paper. It may make you look less ignorant.
You can already buy f1.2 (and larger) native lenses in E-mount, just not from Sony. Sony has a patent for a 28-70/2 https://photorumors.com/2016/01/28/sony-fe-28-70mm-f2-lens-patent/ which they may or my not make. The likelihood that they will has probably increased.
You can also adapt all the Canon f1.2 lenses (including the FD ones) and there are many Canon users who also shoot Sony who use the 85/1.2L with the metabones or MC-11
It is not just about fast lenses - it allows dramatically different lens design.
From Canon's white paper
I don't know what the PST forum is but I'm happy to discuss this there or in person.
Photographic Science and Technology.
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4312633
Come tell us that it is all BS.