DiffractionLtd
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 2,568
- Reaction score
- 1,605
They've adopted more than a few but I figure pixel-shift will probably be the next thing. It's easier and cheaper to copy than innovate in business.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought that pixel shifting was developed in the 90s for microscopy, and the first digital cameras to use it were produced by Ricoh or Hasselblad. I could be wrong.They've adopted more than a few but I figure pixel-shift will probably be the next thing. It's easier and cheaper to copy than innovate in business.
Sony already has added Pixel Shift in the A7Riii.They've adopted more than a few but I figure pixel-shift will probably be the next thing. It's easier and cheaper to copy than innovate in business.
So keep it digital!after producing a 437meg ultra macro shot stacking 24 hi res images, its a total waste of memory space. unless your going to print an image the size of a building.
Don
it was, microscopy that is and is also used in Tv's now too - I think Hassleblad used it first and it was adopted by Ricoh way before Olympus brought it to marketI thought that pixel shifting was developed in the 90s for microscopy, and the first digital cameras to use it were produced by Ricoh or Hasselblad. I could be wrong.They've adopted more than a few but I figure pixel-shift will probably be the next thing. It's easier and cheaper to copy than innovate in business.
Peter
Seriously man. As a new owner of m43 I am so shocked at this trend of "inferiority complex" posts from some members. And I thought the Pentax forum was bad...not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
excellent images though, wonderful detail you have managed to produce, great lighting helps too:-Dafter producing a 437meg ultra macro shot stacking 24 hi res images, its a total waste of memory space. unless your going to print an image the size of a building.
Don
--
Olympus EM5, EM5mk2 my toys.
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/9412035244
past toys. k100d, k10d,k7,fz5,fz150,500uz,canon G9, Olympus xz1
what Oly did was stick them all into the EM1 MKII, it is a feature rich camera to say the leastSeriously man. As a new owner of m43 I am so shocked at this trend of "inferiority complex" posts from some members. And I thought the Pentax forum was bad...not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
Every company does it like you said and I am fine with it cause they keep refining those features and we all win in the end.
Shame I cant post the original, the detail was defiantly amazing and fairly simple to do even using a flash on low to take the 8 burst shots. I was so intrigued as to do more pixels matter. this is a pretty good comparison.excellent images though, wonderful detail you have managed to produce, great lighting helps too:-Dafter producing a 437meg ultra macro shot stacking 24 hi res images, its a total waste of memory space. unless your going to print an image the size of a building.
Don
Yes the image can be zoomed in and in and in its a pixel peepers delight. you have to try it at least once just to see what a M Format macro would look like with 10x the dofSo keep it digital!after producing a 437meg ultra macro shot stacking 24 hi res images, its a total waste of memory space. unless your going to print an image the size of a building.
Don
Personally, I think it’s awesome. Your images is a window into another, microscopic, world. And as you get sucked in, zoom deeper and deeper, you make new discoveries and realizations! Fascinating.
Like?not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
let's start with IBIS...your turnLike?not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
Pixel shift?Like?not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
Be a lot easier if you say what you ...... think was adopted from m4/3 to other cameras or camera companies ;-) The answer will probably be not a lot if any if you know camera history.Like?not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
Add another new adopter to this impression. I haven't even received my m4/3 gear yet and, reading this forum, I'm thinking it must be a flawed format.Seriously man. As a new owner of m43 I am so shocked at this trend of "inferiority complex" posts from some members. And I thought the Pentax forum was bad...not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
Every company does it like you said and I am fine with it cause they keep refining those features and we all win in the end.
There are not capable admins, or they suffer from the same syndrome too... Nothing to do with the system.Add another new adopter to this impression. I haven't even received my m4/3 gear yet and, reading this forum, I'm thinking it must be a flawed format.Seriously man. As a new owner of m43 I am so shocked at this trend of "inferiority complex" posts from some members. And I thought the Pentax forum was bad...not this again, all companies copy others good ideas, Olympus hasn't been shy about doing this.....just like everyone else
Every company does it like you said and I am fine with it cause they keep refining those features and we all win in the end.
One sensor based innovation that is missing and I am sure someone will make it, EM5 III for example could be a possible camera to introduce it.
The Graduated ISO sensor, that will make all the expensive and cumbersome square filters and their adapters an obsolete...
It is not so difficult. And it is so needed...!!!!