Anyone gone to xt20 from m4/3?

Started 4 months ago | Questions thread
SrMi
SrMi Regular Member • Posts: 341
Re: Anyone gone to xt20 from m4/3?

Bob Tullis wrote:

SrMi wrote:

third son wrote:

I did exactly that. Em5II, EM1 and 12-40mm, 100-400mm 9-18mm, various primes. Now look at my gear list. Fuji resolution is better for what I need. The sensor in m4/3 needs an update.

Olympus EM1m2 has a considerably better sensor than both Em5II and EM1. That was a good update.

It was? I was under the impression besides the slight MP increase, DR and noise at all ISOs was pretty much the same (including blue sky ISO 200 noise). That's what lead me to Sony FF from m4/3 - it was two years later that I realized Fuji's X-Trans3 sensors were all the improvement in IQ I was seeking.

That's not to say many of my best photos weren't taken with an Oly m4/3 body.

Yes, it was improved, according to my tests (I still have all the cameras mentioned). According to http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm, the DR of M1m2 is now similar to Fuji's DR and according to DPReviews studio scene, the noise of M1m2 is better than in M1m1.

It is quite probable that Fuji's system (lenses and camera) has hit a sweet spot in the image quality vs. size-weight comparison.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow