Equivalence - dpreview should clarify once for all Locked

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
This thread is locked.
Christof21 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,389
Equivalence - dpreview should clarify once for all

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61399989

Why do we continue to have such posts ???? This is anti-science, this is not a question of opinion. This member has more than 6000 posts.

I really wonder why these members don't  get a "fast" f4 lens for their smartphone. It would be so good for low light,  thin dof, diffraction... You know, f4 is  f4 !!

The solution ? We should be able to answer with a simple link to the dpreview article about equivalence and it should end the discussion. Tthese people spoil numerous threads and are happy spreading their pseudo-science.

Why don't we simply end this debate and allow to have more interesting threads without being bothered by these people who don't want to understand what equivalence is ?

Why this nonsense continues again and again in what I consider to be a good site (dpreview) ?

It really becomes boring...

ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
tex
tko
(unknown member)
tko
(unknown member)
MOD Labe
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow