70-200 2.8 version questions

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
bocajrs Senior Member • Posts: 2,312
Re: 70-200 2.8 version questions

Equisuz wrote:

226Photo wrote:

I saw the Ken Rockwell page but it does not show the G II versions I am seeing.

The versions I am seeing are distinctly labeled differently.

I am seeing "AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II" and "AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G II ED". The "II" is in different places implying different versions.

All this is making me consider the Tamron 70-200 2.8 at near half the cost.

I own the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and I have to say I wish I had coughed up the extra thousand dollars and bought the Nikon it’s just a better lens. Can’t speak to the Tamron as I only tried it for a few minutes before I chose the Sigma.

What I really want to know is what is it about the hundredth anniversary version of this lens that makes it worth $4000? Is there any difference between it and the F2.8 E?

No perf dfference on 100th anniversary e fl and regular e other than the paint coating on them.

Glad I purchased my vrII from bb 2 years ago for $1896...rock solid on my d750

 bocajrs's gear list:bocajrs's gear list
Nikon 1 J4 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-20E III Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm F4G ED VR +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow