MFT vs Mirrorless

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
GARRIGA Regular Member • Posts: 267
Re: MFT vs Mirrorless

Tom_N wrote:

GARRIGA wrote:

Tom_N wrote:

GARRIGA wrote:

Don't MFT double the visual reach by cropping the image versus APS-C's only 1.5-1.6? If I were a bird photographer than that may matter to me.

No, it doesn't "double the reach". Ignoring aspect ratio differences (4:3 vs. 3:2). M4/3 has a crop factor of 2.0 versus full-frame, or 1.33 versus (Nikon/Pentax flavor) APS-C.

That's what I'm saying. Crops by 2. Why I said doubles visual reach.

MFT does not "double the visual reach" with respect to APS-C.

I'm referring both MFT and APS-C to FF. Why I say MFT doubles versus 1.5-1.6 for APS-C. Get it?

-- hide signature --

Quality trumps quantity...

 GARRIGA's gear list:GARRIGA's gear list
Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
sbu
sbu
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow