Hi guys,
I have a question - what focus points do you use? And with what success?
To explain my question. I have a KP with mostly FA 77 attached to it. And I am talking about AF-S now. I shoot mostly at f/2.2 - f/2.8. When I use the center AF point, it is almost always precise, very good indeed. But I would usually like to use the corner ones (out of the 25 cross points, I am not talking about the side linear ones). But those are almost unusable - they miss most of the time.
I read the center point (plus the one above and the one under it) are precise enough for f/2.8, the others are precise enough for f/5.6. When I tried using the corner AF points at f/5.6, the results were all OK. But f/5.6 is definitely not what I need with a fast portrait lens.
I know I can use the center point and recompose. Well, I don´t find the results as sharp as without recomposing. So I try to avoid recomposing if possible.
I know I can use LV. Well, I use it quite a lot when I need something off center to be sharp (which is pretty often). But I just don´t like LV. It is slow, heavy-footed, impractical and lacks the joy of taking photos with an optical viewfinder. I am using a dslr, what is the point of using LV? If I did´t want to use an optical viewfinder, I could have bought a Sony instead...
Eventually, I know I can use the center AF point and shoot from bigger distance and crop later but that is very makeshift solution, I try to avoid it as much as I can.
If the corner AF points were as precise as the center point, I would be as happy as I can get. The great optical viewfinder experience in connection with reliable focusing points would be amazing. I don´t even miss any wider AF coverage, the 25 AF points cover as much as I need.
But I am just stuck with the center point or LV. Am I missing something? Or can you share some experience with the AF points that you use?
mike
I have a question - what focus points do you use? And with what success?
To explain my question. I have a KP with mostly FA 77 attached to it. And I am talking about AF-S now. I shoot mostly at f/2.2 - f/2.8. When I use the center AF point, it is almost always precise, very good indeed. But I would usually like to use the corner ones (out of the 25 cross points, I am not talking about the side linear ones). But those are almost unusable - they miss most of the time.
I read the center point (plus the one above and the one under it) are precise enough for f/2.8, the others are precise enough for f/5.6. When I tried using the corner AF points at f/5.6, the results were all OK. But f/5.6 is definitely not what I need with a fast portrait lens.
I know I can use the center point and recompose. Well, I don´t find the results as sharp as without recomposing. So I try to avoid recomposing if possible.
I know I can use LV. Well, I use it quite a lot when I need something off center to be sharp (which is pretty often). But I just don´t like LV. It is slow, heavy-footed, impractical and lacks the joy of taking photos with an optical viewfinder. I am using a dslr, what is the point of using LV? If I did´t want to use an optical viewfinder, I could have bought a Sony instead...
Eventually, I know I can use the center AF point and shoot from bigger distance and crop later but that is very makeshift solution, I try to avoid it as much as I can.
If the corner AF points were as precise as the center point, I would be as happy as I can get. The great optical viewfinder experience in connection with reliable focusing points would be amazing. I don´t even miss any wider AF coverage, the 25 AF points cover as much as I need.
But I am just stuck with the center point or LV. Am I missing something? Or can you share some experience with the AF points that you use?
mike
Last edited: