ML vs dSLR poll was "interesting" ....

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
PhotoTeach2 Senior Member • Posts: 8,422
ML vs dSLR poll was "interesting" ....
4

I noticed that 80% are now using ML, either fully or partially.

And more than half of the only 20% fully using dSLR admitted they had never (yet) "tried" ML.

Even more reason to believe ML is the camera of the future and dSLR's will eventually be GONE ...

Seriously, I don't see how the dSLR can be taken any/much further, while the future potential of ML is virtually unlimited.

What I want to see expanded is the "Pre-Burst" technology where a half-press starts an internal buffering to allow capturing the "peak" of action BEFORE the peak.

ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
tko
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
tko
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
osv
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow