Travel: 16-35 OR 24-70 with 70-200?

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Kaitlyn Regular Member • Posts: 418
Travel: 16-35 OR 24-70 with 70-200?

I've recently done some longer-term travel with only my 16-35 and 70-200... and couldn't help but feel like there were times where I wanted something longer than 35 but 70 was too long. Looking at my photos, I don't have *that* many photos between 16-23mm, but can also tell that a lot of the shots I just wanted as wide as possible - so obviously 24mm shuts down those opportunities a little but...

How does the 24-70 (f4 IS) compare to 16-35? Of course, 24-105 is an option and I actually already have that lens but not really happy with the image quality from it.

Wonder if I should just add a 50mm prime (ugh, 3rd lens!) or consider swapping my primary kit away from the ultra wide?

ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow