MFT vs Mirrorless

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
Martin.au
Martin.au Forum Pro • Posts: 13,230
Re: MFT vs Mirrorless

Thorgrem wrote:

khunpapa wrote:

richj20 wrote:

lds2k wrote:

Why go to a MFT when today's APC mirrorless camera body and lens combination are the same size or smaller than the current high performance MFT?

Hmmm... is there an APC system that reaches out to 800mm and weighs under 4 pounds?

- Richard

There is. It's called MIRRORLESNS. 😄

Please show me a APS-C mirrorlens with this )or comparable) zoom range.

There's heaps.

http://www.kenkoglobal.com/blog/2015/08/review-of-kenko-mirror-lens-400mm-f8.html

https://www.engadget.com/products/tokina/400mm/f-8/mirror-lens/

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/859192-REG/Samyang_SY500M_500mm_f_8_0_Mirror_Lens.html

However, there's also several reasons they aren't used very much.

 Martin.au's gear list:Martin.au's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G Fisheye 8mm F3.5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
sbu
sbu
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow