MFT vs Mirrorless

Started Apr 7, 2018 | Discussions thread
sybersitizen Forum Pro • Posts: 12,162
Re: mirrorless MFT vs mirrorless APS-C
3

justmeMN wrote:

sybersitizen wrote:

lds2k wrote:

Why go to a MFT when today's APC mirrorless camera body and lens combination are the same size or smaller than the current high performance MFT?

Maybe you should first prove that the APS-C options are the same size or smaller.

Once you do that, the answer to your question involves aspects unrelated to hardware size: brand preferences, design philosophies, specific features, lens options, accessories, etc.

Is the discussion limited to those two cameras? What about all the other MFT and APS-C cameras - and lenses - in the world, like these ... ?

Now that we know the OP's sweeping generalization about size is only partially correct and easily contradicted, we can use the same example above to move along to my second point (brand preferences, design philosophies, specific features, lens options, accessories, etc.):

There's size to drive a personal decision, and then there's also much more to drive a personal decision. That is why choices exist in the first place and why people choose one thing over another.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
sbu
sbu
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow