Testing the 16-50mm & 50-230mm I just purchased

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Jim King
Jim King Veteran Member • Posts: 8,365
Re: Testing the 16-50mm & 50-230mm I just purchased

Carluzky111 wrote:

I do have a question , when I go to 230mm I notice my pictures are smaller in size (under 10mb) , is that by design ? Or am I doing something wrong ?

Just a thought, but maybe the resolution at 230mm is poorer than at shorter FLs, yielding less data to store, and thus a smaller file size.

-- hide signature --

Jim King - Retired Colormonger - Suburban Detroit, Michigan, USA; GMT -5h (EST)
Pentaxian for over 50 years.
* * * * *
There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.
- John Ruskin
* * * * *
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
- Sir Winston Churchill
* * * * *
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
- Albert Einstein (after A. Dumas fils)

 Jim King's gear list:Jim King's gear list
Pentax K-3 Leica M10 Pentax MX-1 Fujifilm X30 Sony RX100 V +117 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow