Not as good as the LX7, nor the LX100

Started 9 months ago | User reviews thread
Flat view
LucaPCP Contributing Member • Posts: 714
Not as good as the LX7, nor the LX100

I got the LX10 as I thought it would be a step up from the LX7, and a pocket-sized version of the LX100.  In truth, I think it is inferior to both.  The LX7 and LX100 have fewer pixels, but the pixels they do have are super sharp; the photos are incredibly sharp, to the pixel.  Further, with their variable aspect ratio, the LX7 and LX100 can perfectly frame many different types of photos, so the pixels are used very efficiently.

Not so the LX10.  The images are a bit mushy -- the lens is not nearly as good -- and lack contrast.  In the end, I get worse images, with less flexibility for aspect ratio.

So in the end I use the LX7 and LX100 all the time, while the LX10 gathers dust.

-- hide signature --


 LucaPCP's gear list:LucaPCP's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Olympus XZ-2 iHS Panasonic LX100 Olympus E-5 Olympus E-M1 +1 more
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
20 megapixels • 3 screen • 24 – 72 mm (3×)
Announced: Sep 19, 2016
LucaPCP's score
Average community score
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Panasonic LX10 Panasonic LX100
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow