DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon 70-200 f/4 IS vs f/2.8 IS II for VIDEO

Started Mar 6, 2018 | Discussions thread
OP BrunoLandMedia Forum Member • Posts: 85
Re: Canon 70-200 f/4 IS vs f/2.8 IS II for VIDEO

Tashi 1 wrote:

I have both lenses the 70-200 f4 IS and the f2.8 II. Funny I saw your thread as I’m thinking about selling the f4 and getting another 2.8. I shoot video on two C100’s, one is a C100 mkII. Also shoot on a 5D3, and an 80d. I got the 80d specifically for my Letus Helix because of the incredible AF.

Call me crazy but I see a difference in the two lenses and prefer the f2.8. The f2.8 just pops more, with more color and vibrancy. I don’t know if it is the difference I see between f4 and f2.8, I tend to think not. As you can see from the video I need at least a 2.8 for low light.

In this video the front angle is with the C100 and f2.8, the left angle is the f4 on the C100 mkII, While the closer shot of the guitarists left hand is with the 24-105 f4 and the 80d. I used Pro Mist filters on all the cameras. I got tired of trying to match the 5D3 and my C100’ so I bought another C100. Now I see a slight difference due to the two different lenses and want another f2.8 to make editing in post easier.

so, there you have it. Both lenses together. Hope this might help.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=46koasuo0S8

This is exactly what I was looking for! Thanks.

I do shoot in low light for things like this and without the time to test extensively I'm glad you use a similar set up. I was just "in front" of the camera shooting some acoustic guitar duo stuff (I've been performing live for 20 years) and the place where we shot had 2 c100's with 24-70 2.8 II's and a 5d mk3 with the 70-200 2.8, along with something Panasonic. I was trying to talk a little shop there with the guy but he was pretty busy and didn't want to really answer any questions. Usually it's the other way around, the "talent" gets bugged by the audio and video guys, not the other way around. HAHA. It's fun for me because I am both sides all the time.

But in a short he said he would never use f/4 for live video or conferences, just not enough light.

DId you find that shooting on the 5diii was better than the 80d for the light? Does that Full Frame gain you anything video?

Anyway, thanks for the advice. I think I am going to keep the 2.8. After reading the replies, I realized that I did get a pretty good deal, I could probably make money on the lens if I decided.

Now I have to go off and decide between 24-70 f/4 and 24-105 f/4 for run and gun. the 24-70 2.8 II is out of my price range, and I need the IS. Luckily I have both of those lenses to compare by tomorrow.

Cheers

 BrunoLandMedia's gear list:BrunoLandMedia's gear list
Canon EOS R Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Art +6 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow