Is the 35 f1.8G ED worth it over 35 f1.8 G DX?

Started Jan 24, 2018 | Questions thread
Flat view
flashpixx Contributing Member • Posts: 797
Is the 35 f1.8G ED worth it over 35 f1.8 G DX?

Here in OZ price difference is $765 for FX vs $225 for DX

On a D500 is the FX version that much better?

The DX gets good reviews, but nothing from Thom or Ken about the difference between the two.

Thoughts from those that have used both?

Thank you

-- hide signature --
 flashpixx's gear list:flashpixx's gear list
Nikon D750 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II +5 more
This question has not been answered yet.
Nikon D500
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow