if i shoot mostly with zoom lenses such as th 24-70L would i be
better off with the nikon obvious with their lens equivalent
some people have told me the nikon lenses have better contrast
just wondering your thought
That's really more on a lens-by-lens basis. Both companies make
some sterling optics that are better than the other, and I would
rate Canon's 24-70/2.8L a hair above Nikon's "aging" 28-70/2.8
AF-S, with the exception of the finish and the blasted hood! (I
really, really hate the hood attachment on Canon's lens). Canon has
still failed to produce a quality W/A zoom comparable to the
equivalent Nikkors, even though their 17-40/4L is a nice piece and
comes closer than anything to date (the 16-35 is a dog). Nikon's
new 70-200/2.8 VR AFS is a notch above Canon's equivalent, older
70-200/2.8L IS. But it's really the long teles that give Canon a
considerable advantage for me personally.
i will probably wait to switch back until nikon produces an equal
to the 1ds
I still prefer Nikon's bodies, and the D100 to a 10D for almost
every purpose, but I'm anxiously waiting to see what Canon comes
out with for a 1D replacement. I can adjust to the quirky
differences in functionality as long as it has what I'm looking
for. If the 1D successor is what it is rumored to be: 8MP, 1.3x,
25+ frame buffer, better AWB, image zoom and auto-rotation, low
noise CMOS with no banding, slightly more aggressive AA filter to
help with moire, etc -- then I may become a Canonian for life,
though I can't help my deep-rooted affinity for the Yellow & Black.
We shall see.
--
Brendan
==========
Equipment list in profile -- where it BELONGS!