Buy an FE 16-35 f/2.8 III or the FE 24-70 f/2.8 II ??

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
OP Blind Bill Regular Member • Posts: 139
Re: Did you consider EF 16-35/4LIS?

Thank you! I took a closer look at the 16-35 f/4L IS and noticed the substantial difference in cost over the 2.8. And I can apply the savings (and a little bit more) to pick up a EF 100-300 f/4-5.6 tele!!

Just curious - why would you buy a 15 year old (technology) 100-300 that was only rated as "reasonable" back in 2004 ?

Surely a new 70-300 would be a far better option on a budget, or a 100-400L ii if budget is more expansive ?

Colin

You're absolutely right Colin....and I do have the 70-300 on my list.  That was my mistake to list it as a 100-300.

Al

 Blind Bill's gear list:Blind Bill's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Canon Extender EF 1.4x III +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow