DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

How much better is 50mm 1.8 over 22mm 2.0 in terms of taking portraits?

Started Jan 14, 2018 | Questions thread
007peter
007peter Forum Pro • Posts: 12,933
NIGHT & DAY, 50/1.8 is enough, 50/1.4 is a soft lens with whiny AF motor
6

The problem with 22mm are 3 folds:

1. You can't get sufficiently Thin DOF without shooting CLOSE to the subject

2. but shooting Close to the Subject induce unpleasant Facial Distortion (nose)

3. 22mm (too wide) doesn't compress background enough

Where as 50mm f/1.8 are

1. Telephoto enough to induce background compression

2. You don't need to shoot NEAR your subject to produce decent Bokeh

My only recommendation is to avoid the nasty Canon 50/1.4 @all cost:

  • This lens is OLD
  • It has a FAKE USM (Micro-USM)
  • F/1.4 is horribly SOFT, and GHOSTING
  • 50/1.4 require stepping down past f/2.8 to achieve decent sharpness
  • 50/1.4 @1.8 is much softer than 50/1.8 wide open

Good 50/1.4 review and studied it, you're discover its weakness.  I bought one and return it for 50/1.8 II.  It cannot compete against the newest Canon 50/1.8 STM in any IQ  test.

 007peter's gear list:007peter's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Panasonic 20mm F1.7 II
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow