Panasonic 100-400

Started 9 months ago | User reviews thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
paff1234 New Member • Posts: 4
Panasonic 100-400
6

From 2011 I used the 100-300 Pana, and from September 2016 I bought the 100-400 Pana, based on both I can make a comparison on this lens. Positive aspects: excellent blurred, considering that it is a zoom with 20 lenses, excellent stabilization, very solid and well finished construction. Excellent handling that allows you to use a 200-800 equivalent freehand without getting tired. Negatives: at focal lengths from 300 to 400 mm to get a great detail it is necessary to close the diaphragm at least at f / 7.1 or f / 8, unlike the 100-300 Pana that at full aperture is already very clear. If we consider the price and the low brightness to 400 mm (6.3) the quality should already be very good at 6,3. The body is not tropicalized, after 18 months of use, even if it is treated very carefully, it already has some granules of dust on the internal lenses.

paff1234's score
3.5
Average community score
4.6
Panasonic Leica 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 ASPH
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow