3D Pop Lenses - Are Older Better?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
Reilly Diefenbach
Reilly Diefenbach Forum Pro • Posts: 12,665
Re: 3D Pop Lenses - Are Older Better?

SpinOne wrote:

vyoufinder wrote:

I suspect that more than half the respondents to this thread and others similar are wholly biased by the fact that they have not tried both and done direct comparisons.

I've compared lenses, I've looked at examples, I've read the pseudo-scientific garbage. I have yet to see a consistent definition of it, let alone consistent examples of it, let alone any viable explanations for why it is both lens-dependent yet somehow not detectable based on physical properties of those lenses.

Here's as good a definition as you need:

https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=843&Camera=736&Sample=0&FLI=4&API=1&LensComp=1085&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=4

Contrast and veiling flare are different between lenses. Nothing whatever to do with background blur. Just the lens. One has pop, the other doesn't.

 Reilly Diefenbach's gear list:Reilly Diefenbach's gear list
Nikon D500 Nikon D850
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tko
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow