DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon 17-40mm L vs 16-35mm L for Real Estate Photography

Started Jan 2, 2018 | Discussions thread
gipper51 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,904
Re: Canon 17-40mm L vs 16-35mm L for Real Estate Photography
5

MjMart85 wrote:

Happy New Year everybody! First of all, I currently own a 17-40 mm and find that it is pretty good, and the price point was awesome when I bought it. I am shooting more and more real estate and a few people have told me to move up to the 16-35mm.. Am I really gaining that much more with that lens? I shoot with a Canon 5d Mark III. Any info you can provide would be greatly appreciated!

-Matt

Do you want to upgrade for business or personal reasons?  If for business reasons, save the money.  Real estate clients posting to the web won't notice the difference and the new lens won't make you any more money.  If you want to satisfy your personal desires and own finer equipment, then upgrade to the newer 16-35 f4 as it's certainly better than the 17-40.

I shot architecture for clients for several years with the 17-40L as my main lens.  It took many shots in my portfolio that I'm proud of.  The main weakness was soft corners at the wide end, and it took f11 for them to become decent.  But nobody cared, and nobody writing a check noticed a difference with the new and improved 16-35 when I upgraded.  But it made me happier, so it was worth it

-- hide signature --
 gipper51's gear list:gipper51's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM +20 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow