DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon 17-40mm L vs 16-35mm L for Real Estate Photography

Started Jan 2, 2018 | Discussions thread
BlueRay2 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,816
Re: Canon 17-40mm L vs 16-35mm L for Real Estate Photography
1

hotdog321 wrote:

I would switch to the 16-35 f/4L IS, though the 16-35 f/2.8L III is also a winner. First, that extra millimeter is pretty sweet for architectural work. Second, the critical edges and corners are much sharper on full frame bodies. Finally, the IS function is useful if you find yourself in a "run and gun" or video situation and don't have time for a tripod.

As an aside, I'm in love with the 11-24 f/4L for architecture, but it is pretty pricey and heavy.

for serious architecture photography, i don't think if any other lens can come close to canon TSE 17mm/24mm lenses! but prices for those 2 lenses are a bit steep! if someone uses those lenses for business and can cover the price, eventually, i think that should be the 1st consideration! canon 16-35 IS/1635 f2.8 III are excellent, also, but not as brilliant as TSE lenses, IMO! YMMV.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow