DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon 17-40mm L vs 16-35mm L for Real Estate Photography

Started Jan 2, 2018 | Discussions thread
hotdog321
hotdog321 Forum Pro • Posts: 21,141
Re: Canon 17-40mm L vs 16-35mm L for Real Estate Photography
2

I would switch to the 16-35 f/4L IS, though the 16-35 f/2.8L III is also a winner. First, that extra millimeter is pretty sweet for architectural work. Second, the critical edges and corners are much sharper on full frame bodies. Finally, the IS function is useful if you find yourself in a "run and gun" or video situation and don't have time for a tripod.

As an aside, I'm in love with the 11-24 f/4L for architecture, but it is pretty pricey and heavy.

-- hide signature --
 hotdog321's gear list:hotdog321's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow