Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS

Started 9 months ago | Questions thread
KWEnz Regular Member • Posts: 377
Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS

1Dx4me wrote:

2Risky wrote:

I don't recall there being any difference between the two lenses although admittedly the ownership wasn't concurrent. I do remember wondering why I upgraded to IS. I guess I thought I would be using it in some low light shoots.

Instead I got the f 2.8 ii, which is definitely impressive but a beast to carry around, which is why I still have the f 4 version. Under the right conditions both are capable of some very impressive output but the f 4 can't separate the subject from the background like the f 2.8 can.

i disagree with that statement, please post your best shot with f2.8 II and lets compare, here is why and look at isolation and bokeh:

Even with the 1.4x TC attached the f4.0 IS gives a nice out of focus background:

 KWEnz's gear list:KWEnz's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon Extender EF 1.4x II Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +14 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow