DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

500mm vs 600mm?

Started Nov 13, 2017 | Questions thread
BlueRay2 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,816
Re: 500mm vs 600mm?

dgumshu wrote:

Steve Balcombe wrote:

1Dx4me wrote:

Porsche 91730 wrote:

The extra reach of the new 600 F4 USM IS II is well worth its price, particularly if you like to photograph birds. And the weight of the new 600 F4 USM IS II has been reduced to the approximate weight of the “old” 500 F4 USM IS, and that is a significant improvement. As another poster stated, one can get used to the weight of the 600 F4 USM IS II.

although the newer 600 f4.0 II has shed a lot of weight, it is still heavy for handhold photography! i can hold mine only for a few minutes before feeling my right arm slowly going south

Most of the 600 (and old 500) owners I know struggle a bit with the weight, both in use if not using a tripod, and getting around. And if you do use a tripod, it needs to be a big one and you have to carry that as well!

Yeap... sold the 600 and kept the 500 ll, but it's still a chore. I love the lens, but use the 400 DO ll + TC more often. Trying to hand hold it (still) for any longer than a minute becomes tiresome. Got to take a monopod out with it just in case.

i think canon should devise something like a hot air balloon to hold these heavy white primes so the users can easily hold the lens and use them, you know, something to think about   i always find it annoying carrying those heavy tripods around!

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
jjl
jjl
jjl
jjl
jjl
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow