DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

18-150 or 55-200 for landscape?

Started Nov 22, 2017 | Discussions thread
OP Bhotoz Senior Member • Posts: 1,561
Re: 18-150 or 55-200 for landscape?

Yes, Tronhar, I have thought that too, it might be a problem when shooting handheld. (I do shoot landscapes on tripod, too, but still...) That's why, at first, I was going to buy only M3 + 11-22mm, nothing else, but here we are again... Canon, or somebody, should make a good compact UWA "landscape camera"!

I also prefer to shoot kids with dslr, because when I'm using viewfinder, they look straight at camera (if I want them looking at camera). Of course dslr is also much quicker in every way than M3.

About longer lenses for my M. I really _should_ buy 18-150mm and not think that 55-200mm would give me a little better image quality. 18-150mm would have enough reach for landscapes, and also very handy when travelling. But I'm sick of 18-150mm (and M5) cost so much here...

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow