Metabones Mark iV vs V?

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
pixelationX
OP pixelationX Contributing Member • Posts: 527
Re: Metabones Mark iV vs V?

So that means its better to buy native lenses then? I was just checking a headshots session I did recently with 200mm f2.8L ii and out of about 50 shots i was able to get only 5-7 in perfect focus (eyes) all others had either back focus or the eye browse in focus. They are still useable because in normal viewing distance from the monitor you hardly notice it. But as a photographer its not acceptable to me obviously.

I mainly used eye AF, i tried to use the single focus point but as soon as the camera detects the face it puts a square on the face and always selects the point automatically, couldnt find how to turn that off?

I love the camera and dont want to go back to a dslr...but native lenses are way too expensive. I want to use this 200mm f2.8L ii lens as its cheap and does the job well. Sony doesnt have an equivalent lens.

 pixelationX's gear list:pixelationX's gear list
Ricoh Theta S Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Panasonic Leica D Summilux Asph 25mm F1.4
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow