(I swiped that acronym from the computer geeks.)
You may remember that last year I compared the Pentax K-70 (in pixel-shift mode) with my SD1M and DPxM cams. At that time I found that the Pentax had better resolution than any of the Sigmas except for the DP3M.
My technique has improved a bit since then, and I have even 'dipped my toe' in the ocean of RawTherapee processing, which has a template now for Pentax PS processing.
I was out today trying to capture some vineyard colors (sadly, almost all the local vineyards now have fences and 'no trespassing' signs), so here's a comparison of the K-70 and DP3M. I shot both cams at f/5.6, manual focus, delayed shutter, and from the same tripod. The K-70 was zoomed to 50 mm but the photo says it was really 48 mm. Focus was on the red leaf in the center.
First, the zoomed-in comparison - RawTherapee on left, SilkyPix center, and Sigma right:
And here are the (half-sized) images:
(BTW, whenever I am out with the Pentax and a tripod, I shoot everything that might possibly be stationary in PS mode. Memory cards and external hard drives are cheap.)
My take-away on this is that the K-70 is an inexpensive way to experiment with pixel-shift. For the kind of photography I do, only gale-force winds prevent me from getting a decent result from pixel-shift. I only wish that Sigma would make more lenses for the Pentax mount.
|Street Food 2017 by ziggyzag|
from Your City - Fast Food
|Running free by LassiM|
|1969 Oldsmobile 442 Resto-Mod by J Warren|
from O is for...