Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4 vs Canon 16-35mm f/4 IS

Started Nov 21, 2017 | Discussions thread
PWPhotography Senior Member • Posts: 5,442
Re: Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4 vs Canon 16-35mm f/4 IS

kelly15 wrote:

Sony GM cost is 3 times the cost of the Canon.

Different categories however. That should compare to Canon 16-35L/2.8 III.

For sure it is 2.8 and fully functional.

That could be important to some.

Quality wise I do not know but when I briefly tested the Sony 12-24 compared to same Canon 16-35 f. 4.0 focal lenghts, at the the end I preferred the Canon by a margin.

Apple to Orange. They are in different FL. In general, 16-35 zoom optically is better than 11/12-24. But 12-24 FE is better from 12-15 in single shot FE 12-24 is compared to Canon 11-24L and is lighter/smaller and cheaper. Optically as good as if not even slight better according to Joger's test.

Personal experience, of course but my conclusion is that the Canon is a gem.

Nothing against. That's what I am using now and have many photos from it, and I got the best deal then - Canon factory refurbished + additional 15% off together with 100-400L IS II in one order and shipping. Not  my top priority to replace but will replace in one year I guess and hope there is some deal then.

To OP, each has pro and con, personal choice between two f/4 versions.

 PWPhotography's gear list:PWPhotography's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Mark III Sony a9 Sony a7R III Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow