Best DSLR or ILC for Night Sky Imaging?

Started Nov 8, 2017 | Questions thread
1DSmII Contributing Member • Posts: 793
Re: If you want the best, a dedicated cooled CCD cameras are far better than all the DSLRs and ILCs
2

kiwi2 wrote:

What Roger is leaving out in his formulas, is the inverse-square law. Light fades the further it has to travel. A longer focal length lens may have a larger aperture, but then the light also has to travel further over the focal length of the lens.

I can't see how this can be correct. The inverse square law says that if you double the distance then you are left with 1/4 of the light (if memory serves).

Lets say you are imaging a star that is 100 light years away, then you would have to move a further 100 light years away from that star to be receiving 1/4 of the light that you were receiving at 100 light years, all other things being equal. The length of the lens is irrelevant, especially if the sensor remains at the same distance from the star.

A few inches, feet, or even miles difference between the first/front element and the sensor is not going to have any significant impact on the light intensity. Obviously, the light transmission of a huge optic would play a part, so for the experiment to work, the longer lens would need to have the same light transmission characteristics as the shorter lens you are comparing to.

If what you said was true then it would imply that if you image the same star in January, and again in August, the brightness of that star would be significantly changed comparing one image to the other, since we have moved millions of miles nearer to or further from the star, and this is simply not the case.

-- hide signature --

Leo S.

 1DSmII's gear list:1DSmII's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Mark II N Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D +18 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow