Why do you need another crippled Pentax APS-C flagship?

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
Jim in Hudson Senior Member • Posts: 2,236
Re: "crippled" is not absolute
2

LightBug wrote:

Most people do not need lightning fast AF tracking to capture what they need, so I can see how you have upset people with the strong wording in the title.

I have K-S2 and Sigma HSM II 50-150mm, and it captures my son fine in his 6-and-under soccer matches. So count me in as one that feels Pentax AF is sufficient for my needs.

If we call Pentax AF crippled just because it cannot track fast diving birds, can we call Nikon or Canon image quality crippled because they do not offer pixel shift for still objects?

I think there is market for cameras with fast AF tracking and for cameras with good image quality. Pentax's main draw for me has always been value for the money on the image quality front, so for people that feel current Pentax AF tracking is sufficient or not needed, a flagship with better image quality but same or incrementally improved AF tracking would still be a nice upgrade.

Joey

I don't see how pixel shift can be compared to AF.  Pixel shift provides an incremental increase in resolution that can best be seen under high magnification.  An out-of-focus image is just bad no matter what.

 Jim in Hudson's gear list:Jim in Hudson's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Pentax K-3 Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pentax smc DA 55-300mm F4.0-5.8 ED Pentax smc DA 18-135mm F3.5-5.6ED AL [IF] DC WR +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
mxx
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow