Review - Sigma dp3 Quattro.

Sergey_Green wrote:

Landscapes / scenery and Studio / still life is where it truly excels. Studio portraits (as long as no one moves) could also be an option. I would not use it for anything else. Now that D850 has arrived I see it comfortably passes Quattros for anything I can think of.

I did not realize you were in Paris, recognized some of the images.

-sergey

I live in paris.
Some photos were made around the small village where my parents live, 250 km from Paris.

It is true that ultra-pixelated bayer digital cameras are very interesting alternatives to quattro.
the quattro have certe, a capacity to restore the details comparable to the 40 to 50 Mpix bayer sensors, but it is true that they are much more limited.
In addition, even if the level of detail rendered is equivalent (IQ), the interpolation is losing finesse in the rendering of the details, compared to a photo from a bayer sensor very well processed and made with a very good goal. But I have often seen photos made with bayer sensors having the highest definitions, the rendering of details is worse than my photos from quattro interpolated to 39Mpix, sometimes even 60 Mpix.

The price of quattro is much lower.
The rendering is also different. Although it is true that by reducing a photo from a bayer sensor, and applying the appropriate processing, it is possible to approach, see equalize the foveon rendering. Especially for landscape photos.
But more difficult with photos of textures. Especially the quattro provides a very good feeling of texture.

Dp quattro have the advent of compactness.

I think if sigma managed to release a quattro 20 - 25 Mpix, to have a 3200 iso (or even better at 6400 iso) as good as the 800 iso, they would sell a lot more.