DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Had to choose, went to Fuji. XT-2 vs NX500 comparison

Started Oct 28, 2017 | Discussions thread
flip 21
flip 21 Senior Member • Posts: 1,439
Re: Had to choose, went to Fuji. XT-2 vs NX500 comparison

arbux wrote:

flip 21 wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

Right now Fuji seems to be the only alternative to NX, but they aren't there yet, especially for video people. There are rumors about a video specialized Fuji coming next year, together with the 18-55 and 50-150 cine lenses would be an amazingly NX set for serious cinematography.

It is funny how kisaha never mentions Sony as an alternative.. It makes me laugh that's all

MAx yuriev loves his NX1, but he also loves his A6500. For me, let's just pray for Sony to come up with great APSc cameras in the future, and better lenses, otherwise, I think the APSc might die...

Maybe that's why Kisaha never mentions Sony as an alternative, because sony would need to come up with both body and lesnes to be one.

But why does he mentions Fuji? For video? The XT-2 don't even do 1080p at 120 fps... Also, it is worst in low light... what makes me laugh is that Kisaha does this deliberately, but on EOSHD forum, he is always talking about how the A6500 does this wonderful things like doing 6400 ISO in video with almost no noise.

The A6500/A6300 body sucks, but it is small and compact. It overheats, for me that's unacceptable. The NX1 is much better, it is true. We all know that :). The NX1 owners don't need the A6500 right now, that is also true, but in the future, who knows, and as thing are going, in one or two years we can get the A6300 with the kit lens for 500€. I can bet that Kisaha will have one than... He hates Sony, like he hates me snif, snif... oh no, I'm getting too emotional here... just give me  a few seconds... BUhhhhAAAAA!!!!!

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow