Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

Started Sep 20, 2017 | Questions thread
Lance B Forum Pro • Posts: 31,245
Re: Ephotozine shows Nikon better than the Canon for sharpness

A Weed wrote:

Lance B wrote:

jaykumarr wrote:

To my surprise DxOMark has given higher scoring for 80-400 Nikon than 100-400 Canon. I assume that should not be taken seriously and closer macro distance has value!!

Well, Ephotozine has it sharper than the Canon 100-400 on similar Mp bodies - 5D MKIII to the Nikon D600:



GIGO. That's a foolish extrapolation. Similar is not identical.

LOL. Nice try weedy, but your opinion here is of little worth as usual. The foolishness is the belief that the difference is due to a couple of Mp as the sharpness difference is too large in this particular test. Nice try to denigrate but you failed once again.

Why not cite Lenscore? Are you not especially fond of it (or is that only insofar as the 400 f/2.8 is concerned?)?

Lenscore is also a very good resource, as is Photozone, CameraLabs, Photography Life. All these resources are valuable to garner a feel for the lens. However, just because one says one lens is better under one test scenario doesn't diminish the value of another that says the other lens is better under another test scenario. What it tells us is that they are very close and comparable.

-- hide signature --
 Lance B's gear list:Lance B's gear list
Nikon D850 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24mm f/1.4G ED Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm F2.8G IF-ED VR Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-17E II +13 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow