Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

Started Sep 20, 2017 | Questions thread
Tord S Eriksson
Tord S Eriksson Forum Pro • Posts: 10,792
Re: Ephotozine shows Nikon better than the Canon for sharpness

Lance B wrote:

jaykumarr wrote:

To my surprise DxOMark has given higher scoring for 80-400 Nikon than 100-400 Canon. I assume that should not be taken seriously and closer macro distance has value!!

Well, Ephotozine has it sharper than the Canon 100-400 on similar Mp bodies - 5D MKIII to the Nikon D600:



Maybe the D600 isn't the best to compare with, due to its slightly heavyhanded AA filter.

My own issues with the 80-400G were entirely due to AF issues, seldom its sharpness, although I found it, at longer distances, @ 350-400mm, wanting.

In short, it drove me nuts, when used with a Nikon 1 camera (should have been a perfect match, as it balanced beautifully then). If you saw a raptor in a distant tree you could be sure it would not focus!

No such issues with the Sigma I now use! Which is much cheaper as well! And has a longer focusing range!

The weight distribution with the 80-400G is delightful, the size is delightful, and it worked great with my D600!

For the same price, I got the Sigma 150-600 Sports and the 70-200/4.0G, a much better investment!

-- hide signature --

Tord_2 (at) photographer (dot) net
Nikon V2, J5, D3300, D7500 & D600, some m4/3.

 Tord S Eriksson's gear list:Tord S Eriksson's gear list
Olympus C-8080 Wide Zoom Ricoh GR Nikon 1 V1 Nikon D600 Nikon 1 V2 +25 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow