Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

Started 9 months ago | Questions thread
(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 188
Re: Ephotozine shows Nikon better than the Canon for sharpness

Lance B wrote:

jaykumarr wrote:

To my surprise DxOMark has given higher scoring for 80-400 Nikon than 100-400 Canon. I assume that should not be taken seriously and closer macro distance has value!!

Well, Ephotozine has it sharper than the Canon 100-400 on similar Mp bodies - 5D MKIII to the Nikon D600:

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/canon-ef-100-400mm-f-4-5-5-6l-is-ii-usm-lens-review-26892

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/nikon-nikkor-80-400mm-f-4-5-5-6g-ed-vr-ii-review-22065

GIGO. That's a foolish extrapolation. Similar is not identical.

Why not cite Lenscore? Are you not especially fond of it (or is that only insofar as the 400 f/2.8 is concerned?)?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow