Nikon 70-200mm f/4 v Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
ChapelThrill23 Contributing Member • Posts: 912
Re: Nikon 70-200mm f/4 v Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL

"I'll be damned if I can find a comparison of these two on the internet still. Anyone care to chime in with a link at all? If sharpness is equal from f/4 it renders the f/2.8 version pointless to me. I own the f/4, it's very, very good but it's weight advantage is massive..."

Honestly it sounds like you have no need for the 2.8 since you don't need the speed, think the 4 is "very, very good" and think it has a massive weight advantage. The 4 is a fantastic lens that can easily give you huge prints. Any difference, if it exists, in sharpness at f/4 is only going to show up when doing extreme pixel peeping. The reason to me to get the 2.8 is that extra stop but that doesn't seem like what you are after.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow