Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

Started 11 months ago | Questions thread
(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 188
Re: Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

Ando72 wrote:

A Weed wrote:

Ando72 wrote:

I don’t really understand the comparison of similar lenses across brands. Maybe as a purely academic exercise but how many people are actually shopping with the true intent to buy one or the other?

You must also not understand the comparison of bodies across brands, right?

Sure I do. For a lens though the thing is, unless you’re planning on switching brands entirely, what difference does it make? As a Nikon user, I can’t see how the fact that the Canon 100-400 is a better lens will influence my decision to buy the 80-400 or not. I guess there might be a small subset of users that want to run dual systems.

Many people don't believe in rewarding companies for inferior products.

A company that thinks it has a captive demographic and churns out an uncompetitive product will soon see people voting with their feet--regardless of how entrenched they might be at the outset.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow