Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

Started Sep 20, 2017 | Questions thread
fishy wishy
fishy wishy Veteran Member • Posts: 8,690
Re: Why there are no reviews for 80-400 ?

jaykumarr wrote:

In both dpreview.com or photozone.de Canon 100-400 MkII review is there. But not Nikon 80-400 .

That is despite the fact that Nikon's price is 10% more, zoom is 20% wider ... appearing to be a slightly better lens. why is that ?

Is there any comparison between these two?
out of focus

lenstip to the rescue:

"the Nikkor AF-S 80–400 mm f/4.5–5.6G ED VR is a very sharp and a very good lens but certainly not such an outstanding instrument, resolution-wise, as the Canon EF 100–400 mm f/4.5–5.6L IS II USM"

I prefer Nikon sensor performance but you don't want to get into a lens shootout with Canon, the 100-400 II and 70-200 IS II are particularly brilliant.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow