Petition against Sony's Star Eater

Started Jul 29, 2017 | Discussions thread
BBQue Senior Member • Posts: 7,735
Re: Petition against Sony's Star Eater
1

sharkmelley wrote:

BBQue wrote:

fred 76 wrote:

The photo you linked is a non sense to demonstrate anything about Star Eater ! It is a wide wide field, shot in panorama that should extend over 10000 pixels in width, and reduced to less than 1500 pixels width... You will hardly see any difference on that kind of photo whether you shoot it with smartphone or a specialized astronomy camera !

The effect of the terrific star Eater algorithm is NOT LIMITED TO ASTRONOMY photos :

https://ip1.i.lithium.com/3aa461867228a65b333fc8ef6586bcffd61be8fd/687474703a2f2f736f6e792e692e6c69746869756d2e636f6d2f74352f696d6167652f736572766572706167652f696d6167652d69642f313436383169393335304237463444324330384137452f696d6167652d73697a652f6f726967696e616c3f763d312e302670783d2d31

There is no Star in the above photo, but the degradation is still VERY visible unless you are blind...

I am not blind - in fact I have tried exactly same with my A7rii. I am unable to even remotely reproduce the effect in your sample. I have posted full size results a few months ago in these forums.

I think you might be referring to the example you posted here:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59656067

and I replied here:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59656278

To re-iterate: in your own example the point sources of light on the horizon (plus those reflected in the hotel windows) either disappeared or turned into miscolored blobs because of star eater. Now imagine what would happen if you took a picture of a whole sky full of point sources.

Mark

Well, the images I posted are there - thanks for digging up my old link, I was too lazy yesterday... I get your point. But there are plenty of tiniest point light sources in these also that appear unaffected. everyone can look at them and come to their own conclusions.

At least I went through the trouble of making my own tests For my purposes, this is well beyond "good enough" and I suspect for 99% of astro hobbyists it is too.

For the 1% hard core astro photographers, it is not - something I never disputed. And which is why I was one of the first to sign this petition.

Enough said.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
osv
osv
osv
osv
osv
osv
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow