Doing Samsung NX again - Mistake?

CCD FTW wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Nikon Canon all have fisheye lenses.

Not really,

EOS M's most interesting lenses are the 22mm and the UWZ, I was split between the first EOS M cameras, and NX, and I choose NX(NX300 and 30mm and 12-24mm).

I should have change 5 M cameras since then, and still I would be vastly behind the NX1 camera, while the only M lenses that worth a dime, are still those 2.

Nikon has not a mirrorless system above 1".

What do you mean "Not really"? Nikon DX 10.5mm fisheye is available. The 12-24mm is not a fisheye. Do you have the Samsung NX 10mm fisheye? I do, but only use it sparingly. Fisheye is not meant to be used for every photo.

Nikon also announced they are working on a new mirrorless system. We will see if it ever comes to light.

I only talk for mirrorless systems and native lenses,

and there isn't a native APS-C mirrorless fish eye lens on Canonikon (or Fuji, or Sony for that matter) .

You must be confused, do you mean specifically 'no native autofocus pancake at exactly 10mm fisheye'? Because there are fisheye lenses for every one of those systems, natively.

You, must be confused.

I am talking about full auto, native APS-C  lenses. Not adapted, full manual ones.

Are there any Eos M fisheye lenses? No

Does Nikon has an APS-C mirrorless system at all? No

is there a native AF capable Fuji fish eye lens? Wasn't last time I checked.

Does Sony has a native APS-C fish eye lens?

As of your other reply, I will just leave it there, it's quite long as it is, there is no need for more wasted bytes.