DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Doing Samsung NX again - Mistake?

Started Jul 19, 2017 | Discussions thread
Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: Doing Samsung NX again - Mistake?

VisualFX wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Nikon Canon all have fisheye lenses.

Not really,

EOS M's most interesting lenses are the 22mm and the UWZ, I was split between the first EOS M cameras, and NX, and I choose NX(NX300 and 30mm and 12-24mm).

I should have change 5 M cameras since then, and still I would be vastly behind the NX1 camera, while the only M lenses that worth a dime, are still those 2.

Nikon has not a mirrorless system above 1".

What do you mean "Not really"? Nikon DX 10.5mm fisheye is available. The 12-24mm is not a fisheye. Do you have the Samsung NX 10mm fisheye? I do, but only use it sparingly. Fisheye is not meant to be used for every photo.

Nikon also announced they are working on a new mirrorless system. We will see if it ever comes to light.

I only talk for mirrorless systems and native lenses,

and there isn't a native APS-C mirrorless fish eye lens on Canonikon (or Fuji, or Sony for that matter) .

This is just an example, but the fish eye is my 3rd most used lens (16-50S, 45mm the first 2),. not having the option of such a lens is huge for me, as I use it all the time. Most of the times I have those 3 lenses on 3 NX cameras.

The mount is one of the major issues Nikon is having for their new mirrorless system as it ain't the most versatile one. They have to do it, or else they are doomed.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow